| SFCC Testing Center Director Chantel Reynolds says that using Perception has vastly improved the process and the results of course evaluations. She explains that SFCC has typically used Scantron sheets, and that a faculty member must go to classes to conduct evaluations. Not only does this consume valuable instruction time, collating the data from paper-based evaluations is time-consuming, and instructors often haven’t seen the results for almost three months after the end of the course.
With Perception, the reports are immediate, and instructors see the results right away. Reynolds says this makes the feedback more meaningful for them, and gathering the feedback via Perception has improved its quality. “We get more information out of the students in this format, because they feel like their confidentiality is protected—their handwriting isn’t involved,” Reynolds says. “It also benefits the instructor because the comments have become so much more specific.”
The evaluations also tell faculty chairs what’s going on in the courses. The evaluation includes questions about the instructor’s performance and other aspects of the course, such as the textbook or the support services offered to students. “If 30 of the students say that the textbook isn’t good, that’s something we’ll reevaluate,” Reynolds says. |